User talk:Brya

User talk:Brya

Undo revision 3548050 by Brya (talk)

← Older revision Revision as of 07:05, 8 December 2017
Line 8: Line 8:
 
:::::OK I seem to have made an error with ”Kozlovia” Lipsky (1904) as Index Nom Gen notes the type species as ”K. paleacea” derived from ”Albertia” Regel & Schmalh. (1877), (”A. paleacea”). However, in my defense older circumscriptions (eg Tropicos) of ”Kozlovia” have it as monotypic with the species ”K. longiloba”, which by default would be the type species. The older type would have preference, so it must now be ”K. paleacea” or am I wrong? ! I ought to make the changes in WS with the relevant annotations. However,…. see the edit history on ”[[Kozlovia]]” and [http://ift.tt/1C9loXi discussions on References] for my reluctance to engage in an edit war at this time! Nice to have a calm sensible discussion. [[User:Andyboorman|Andyboorman]] ([[User talk:Andyboorman|talk]]) 09:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:::::OK I seem to have made an error with ”Kozlovia” Lipsky (1904) as Index Nom Gen notes the type species as ”K. paleacea” derived from ”Albertia” Regel & Schmalh. (1877), (”A. paleacea”). However, in my defense older circumscriptions (eg Tropicos) of ”Kozlovia” have it as monotypic with the species ”K. longiloba”, which by default would be the type species. The older type would have preference, so it must now be ”K. paleacea” or am I wrong? ! I ought to make the changes in WS with the relevant annotations. However,…. see the edit history on ”[[Kozlovia]]” and [http://ift.tt/1C9loXi discussions on References] for my reluctance to engage in an edit war at this time! Nice to have a calm sensible discussion. [[User:Andyboorman|Andyboorman]] ([[User talk:Andyboorman|talk]]) 09:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 
::Unfortunately, thinks that he knows more than he actually knows, so please feel free to patrol his edits and correct his errors, though don’t expect any thanks from him. [[User:Stho002|Stho002]] ([[User talk:Stho002|talk]]) 06:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 
::Unfortunately, thinks that he knows more than he actually knows, so please feel free to patrol his edits and correct his errors, though don’t expect any thanks from him. [[User:Stho002|Stho002]] ([[User talk:Stho002|talk]]) 06:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
::::Yes, the climate here does not seem very positive at the moment. Stho002’s reputation precedes him: he is capable of a great deal of valuable work, but he can also carry on, and on (the latter is not as rare in the Wikimedia franchise as one would hope).
+
::::Yes, the Climate here does not seem very positive at the moment. Stho002’s reputation precedes him: he is capable of a great deal of valuable work, but he can also carry on, and on (the latter is not as rare in the Wikimedia franchise as one would hope).
 
::::        I am not particularly interested in what the type of ”Kozlovia” is, but looking at the original description, there is just the one species there, ”K. paleacea”, which would therefore represent the type. I don’t really see any evidence there that ”Kozlovia” is a replacement name for ”Albertia”.
 
::::        I am not particularly interested in what the type of ”Kozlovia” is, but looking at the original description, there is just the one species there, ”K. paleacea”, which would therefore represent the type. I don’t really see any evidence there that ”Kozlovia” is a replacement name for ”Albertia”.
 
::::&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;And yes, I was blocked at enwiki, for refusing to violate the NOR and NPoV-policies. On and off I am thinking of asking for an unblock, now that the core content policies have been tightened, so that they can no longer be overridden by consensus. There are not all that many pages on enwiki that I really care about, so I am not in a real hurry, but there are some. – [[User:Brya|Brya]] ([[User talk:Brya#top|talk]]) 11:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
::::&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;And yes, I was blocked at enwiki, for refusing to violate the NOR and NPoV-policies. On and off I am thinking of asking for an unblock, now that the core content policies have been tightened, so that they can no longer be overridden by consensus. There are not all that many pages on enwiki that I really care about, so I am not in a real hurry, but there are some. – [[User:Brya|Brya]] ([[User talk:Brya#top|talk]]) 11:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)<br />

Source: http://ift.tt/2ADBvCR


 

Affiliates